COMPLETED

Submit to Homebrew

R
Ringo De Smet
3 hours ago 3 votes 5 comments

I use Homebrew to install allmost all of my macOS apps, both CLI tools and applications ending up in /Applications.

I keep track of what I have installed using a Brewfile. This allows me to reinstall a machine very fast.

Please submit MuteDeck to Homebrew as a Cask in https://github.com/homebrew/homebrew-cask or create a separate cask repository in your own Github organization.

5 Comments

M
Martijn Smit Team 3 hours ago

While it's possible to put up a brew package, the installer package is unable to run on the CLI without popping up the installer window. I'd said that defeats the purpose, but what do you think?

D
David 3 hours ago

I'd still vote for this because I like to keep the list of what I want to install for my new machine as a list of brew packages & casks. Even if it's not hands off, having brew manage the list of packages and downloading and running the installers is still worthwhile.

Ringo De Smet
Ringo De Smet 3 hours ago

Martijn, is it an option to convert your installer to a macOS pkg format? This type of package can silently install via Homebrew.

A good example is Google Drive, which provides a disk image (dmg), containing a pkg file. This pkg contains background process (launchctl) and kernel extensions (pkgutil). A lot is possible here.

https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew-cask/blob/master/Casks/g/google-drive.rb

M
Martijn Smit Team 3 hours ago

Ringo De Smet: Hi, thanks for your suggestion - but repackaging isn't a feasible solution. MuteDeck depends on the installer for its updates as well. Check out my general update, though. 😊

M
Martijn Smit Team 3 hours ago

Happy to announce you can now install MuteDeck via Homebrew using: brew install --cask mutedeck/mutedeck/mutedeck

Sign in to comment.

Support

Details

Status
COMPLETED
Submitted
Mar 21, 2026
Updated
3 hours ago